Skip to content

ACM TOS

ACM Transactions on Storage

ACMStorage

Rolling submission, no deadline

From past proceedings

Papers in ACM TOS's main DBLP volume each year, not official acceptance counts.

Full proceedings stats →

Papers in 2025

41

main DBLP volume

5-year change

+17%

vs 2020

Papers, all years

557

22 years since 2005

Authors per paper

7.5

4.7 in 2015

By an entirely new team

24%

of 2025 papers

Papers per year2005 to 2025
2005: 16 papers2006: 18 papers2007: 13 papers2008: 15 papers2009: 21 papers2010: 14 papers2011: 14 papers2012: 17 papers2013: 14 papers2014: 17 papers2015: 19 papers2016: 24 papers2017: 40 papers2018: 36 papers2019: 22 papers2020: 35 papers2021: 32 papers2022: 36 papers2023: 38 papers2024: 27 papers2025: 41 papers
Read the 2025 proceedingsDBLP ↗

Top keywords, 2025

storagefuturememoryssdspast presentpresent and futurestorehigh-performancesectionsurveyarchivalfuture storage technologies

Top topics

  1. Advanced Data Storage Technologies32%
  2. Caching and Content Delivery14%
  3. Algorithms and Data Compression5%
  4. Cloud Computing and Resource Management5%
  5. Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques5%

Most published at ACM TOS

  1. Jiwu Shu2007 to 202623
  2. Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau2005 to 202318
  3. Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau2005 to 202318
  4. Erez Zadok2006 to 202514
  5. Dan Feng2011 to 202614

Who publishes here

2026 · papers count once per institution on them

Academia 82%Industry 11%Government and other 7%

Institutions

  1. 1Tsinghua University🇨🇳10
  2. 2Xiamen University🇨🇳7
  3. 3Chinese University of Hong Kong🇭🇰6
  4. 4Huawei Technologies (China)🇨🇳5
  5. 5Shanghai Jiao Tong University🇨🇳4
  6. 6Huazhong University of Science and Technology🇨🇳4
  7. 7City University of Hong Kong🇭🇰3
  8. 8Peng Cheng Laboratory🇨🇳3

Countries

  1. China33
  2. United States14
  3. Hong Kong SAR China8
  4. South Korea3
  5. Taiwan3
  6. United Arab Emirates2

Affiliations from OpenAlex for the papers DBLP lists. A paper with authors from three institutions counts for each of them; the split above is over the top institutions.